Batman DLC promoted weeks before the game’s release–Why do I even bother?

Remember when game add-ons and patches and DLC sounded like a good thing? Internet connections were once like an all-healing, benevolent messiah that could iron out a game’s technical issues, then shower us with bonus content of all flavors and sizes.

Then game companies got greedy.

As a lifelong Bat-fan, I’m itching to play the latest Batman game installment, Arkham City Origins. Trouble is, I’d feel like a dope buying it on day one. Or even year one.


Oh wow! For just an extra twenty bucks I can complete the game I already paid full-price for. Total steal!

A little over a week ago it was announced that a DLC package entitled “Initiation” was already in the works. The gist of Initiation is that you’ll play through Bruce Wayne’s pre-Batman ninja days. Anyone who has seen Batman Begins knows that Bruce embraced his physical skills and abilities through ninja training. The Initiation DLC won’t deal with Ra’s al Ghul or the League of Shadows, but it will provide some nifty narrative backstory… For a fee, of course.

Obviously, DLC and bonus charges are nothing new, but it’s ridiculous that Origins’ producer is touting upcoming DLC when the game itself hasn’t hit a store shelf yet. And don’t give me that “Just buy a Season Pass” nonsense either. The issue here is that game companies have abused a system that was meant to benefit gamers. We welcomed the idea of downloading updates to fix a bug or two. We loved the idea of having access to bonus content; even when companies slapped a price tag on it, we welcomed having the option.

But now, I feel that new releases aren’t games anymore. They’re subscriptions. And the $60 that loyal fans lay on the sales counter is just the start.


Instead of bat symbol, why not just be frank and make it a dollar sign?

I’m on the fence about buying Arkham Origins this year. I’d love to play the game, but spending $60 on it seems wasteful and foolish, especially when (Spoiler alert!) the inevitable Game of the Year Edition is due in 2014. And once the GOTY version hits the market, it’s price will plummet, just like Arkham City’s GOTY edition, which can be had on Amazon for fifteen bucks.


5 thoughts on “Batman DLC promoted weeks before the game’s release–Why do I even bother?

  1. I’m glad I’m not the only one that thinks DLC releases are getting silly. I wonder how much money would be lost if all the people who bought a game, such as Batman Arkham Origins, ignored the original release to wait until a GOTY appeared. Theoretically, obviously.

    • I wish there was a way to get gamers on the same page about this. However, obviously, if the game didn’t sell, the companies wouldn’t bother with GOTY editions.

      Best we can do is be smart about passing on bare-bones editions.

  2. While I get what you’re saying the simple fact is that no one is forcing you to buy this. Personally I’m not paying $20 for a couple skins and a challenge map. I’ve always been more of a guy who likes standalone expansions like Undead Nightmare or the upcoming Burial at Sea. This kind of crap will stop when people stop buying into it. Consider all the shit Bioware got for releasing Day 1 DLC. If everyone reacted this way we would see less of it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s